Money Laundering Defense Lawyer
Maryland's money laundering provision, Criminal Law § 5-623, reaches the proceeds of drug crimes. Money laundering allegations that do not involve drug proceeds are usually brought in federal court under a much broader statute with far higher exposure. At Walsh-Little Law, David Walsh-Little defends clients facing money laundering and related financial charges in the Maryland state courts and in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.
David Walsh-Little spent over a decade with the Maryland Office of the Public Defender, including three years as chief of the felony trial division in the Baltimore City office, and more than four years as an assistant federal public defender. Because these cases so often sit on the line between the state and federal systems, having practiced on both sides of that line matters here.
Maryland's Money Laundering Statute Only Reaches Drug Proceeds
Criminal Law § 5-623 sits in the controlled dangerous substances title, not the theft or fraud titles, and that placement is not accidental. The statute prohibits receiving, transferring, concealing, transporting, or conducting a financial transaction involving the proceeds of a drug crime, where the person acts with the intent to promote a drug crime or to conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of those proceeds.
Two elements carry the weight. The person must have known the money came from a drug crime, and must have acted with one of those intents. Moving money is not the offense. Moving money with knowledge of its source and with a purpose the statute names is the offense.
The penalties escalate on a repeat. A first violation carries imprisonment of up to 5 years and a fine of up to the greater of $250,000 or twice the value of the proceeds. A subsequent violation carries up to 10 years and a fine of up to the greater of $500,000 or five times the value of the proceeds. The fine is therefore tied to the transaction rather than capped at a fixed figure. Because the statute is drug-specific, conduct that most people would describe as money laundering, moving the proceeds of a fraud, a theft, or an unlicensed business, does not fall under § 5-623 at all. Where the State wants to reach that conduct it generally charges theft, fraud, or a conspiracy instead. Where the federal government wants to reach it, it has a statute built for exactly that purpose.
What's at Stake If You Are Charged
The Federal Statute Is Far Broader, and Far Heavier
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1), a person commits money laundering by conducting a financial transaction knowing that the property involved represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, and doing so with any one of four purposes: to promote the carrying on of a specified unlawful activity, to engage in a tax violation under 26 U.S.C. § 7201 or § 7206, knowing the transaction is designed to conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of the proceeds, or to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under state or federal law.
The maximum is twenty years, with a fine of up to $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved, whichever is greater. That is four times the Maryland maximum, and the predicate is not limited to drugs. A related provision, 18 U.S.C. § 1957, reaches a monetary transaction of more than $10,000 in criminally derived property, and it does not require proof of a concealment purpose at all.
The gap between five years in Maryland and twenty years federally is the reason the charging decision matters more in these cases than in almost any other financial matter.
Forfeiture Runs Alongside the Sentence
Money laundering allegations almost always arrive with a forfeiture claim attached, and forfeiture is a separate proceeding with its own rules and its own timetable. Accounts can be restrained early, which can affect a person's ability to pay ordinary expenses while the case is pending. Property held jointly with a spouse or a business partner is frequently swept in.
Collateral Consequences
A money laundering conviction is treated as an offense involving dishonesty. It affects professional licensing, banking relationships, and security clearances, and for non citizens the immigration consequences can be severe. Anyone holding a license that requires reporting should raise it with counsel at the outset, since reporting obligations often attach on charge rather than on conviction.
Reviews
I recommend David's criminal defense and DWI defense services.
Baltimore criminal defense lawyer David Walsh-Little first came to my attention over 25 years ago, when I learned about his legal assistance to Plowshares activists. Since that time, I have occasionally communicated with him and then talked with David in depth on my podcast.
I can confidently recommend criminal defendants to David for Maryland matters for which I do not offer assistance.
David is a great lawyer to work with. He's very attentive and on top of things. He cares about his clients and is very knowledgeable. Thank you, David
These Cases Are Built From Records, Not Witnesses
Money laundering investigations look different from most criminal cases. There is rarely an eyewitness. What exists instead is a paper trail: bank records, wire transfers, Currency Transaction Reports filed by financial institutions on cash transactions over $10,000, and Suspicious Activity Reports a bank may file without ever telling the customer.
The investigation usually starts with an institution rather than a police officer. A bank's compliance department flags a pattern, files a report, and by the time anyone is interviewed the government already holds a curated set of documents assembled by someone whose interest is regulatory compliance rather than accuracy about intent.
That has a practical consequence for the defense. The transactions themselves are usually not in dispute. What is in dispute is what they meant. A pattern of cash deposits below the reporting threshold looks like structuring to an analyst and looks like ordinary practice to a business that has always dealt in cash. Which reading the records support is examined transaction by transaction, sometimes with a forensic accountant, and the surrounding business context frequently does more work than the ledger.
Money Laundering Defense Strategies in Baltimore
Every case turns on its own facts and its own records, and an approach that fits one matter may be wrong for another. These are the lines of defense that recur in Maryland and federal money laundering cases.
Knowledge of the Source
Both the Maryland and the federal statute require knowledge that the money represented criminal proceeds. Someone who handled funds for a family member, an employer, or a business partner without knowing where they came from lacks the element. This arises constantly in cases built on account activity rather than on anything the accused said.
The Absence of a Qualifying Intent
Under Maryland law the State must show an intent to promote a drug crime or to conceal. Federally the government must establish one of the four purposes in § 1956(a)(1). A transaction that simply moved money, without a purpose the statute names, does not satisfy the element however unusual it looks.
Whether the Predicate Holds
Money laundering is a derivative offense. It depends on proceeds of an underlying crime, a drug crime in Maryland or a specified unlawful activity federally. Where the predicate is weak, contested, or not one the statute lists, the laundering count is exposed with it.
Legitimate Business Explanations
Cash intensive businesses generate exactly the patterns these investigations look for. Restaurants, car sales, construction, salons and corner retail move cash in ways that read as structuring on a chart and as normal operations in the books. Reconstructing the business records is often where the case is genuinely resolved.
Challenging the Valuation
Because both the fine and the forfeiture claim are calculated from the value of the property involved, that figure deserves the same scrutiny as a loss figure in a theft case. Totals assembled quickly from account activity routinely include legitimate transactions and sums counted more than once.
Search, Seizure, and the Financial Records
How the records were obtained, whether a warrant authorized the search that was actually conducted, and whether devices were lawfully seized all bear on what the government may use. Where a search is successfully challenged, the evidence it produced may not be available.
Why Choose David Walsh-Little as Your Baltimore Money Laundering Attorney
David Walsh-Little's background spans both state and federal criminal defense:
- Graduate of Fordham University and Columbia University School of Law
- Interned during law school for civil rights lawyer William M. Kunstler
- Began his career with the Legal Aid Society in the Bronx, representing indigent criminal defendants
- Founded the Sowebo Center for Justice, a grass roots inner city law office in Baltimore
- Over a decade with the Maryland Office of the Public Defender, including three years as chief of the felony trial division in the Baltimore City office
- More than four years as an assistant federal public defender for the District of Maryland
Because a money laundering allegation can be charged in either system, and because the federal maximum is four times the Maryland one, understanding how each side builds these cases matters here. He uses that experience to examine how the government assembled its records, identify weaknesses in the proof of knowledge and intent, and build the strongest available defense for each client.
Serving Baltimore & Surrounding Counties
Walsh-Little Law represents clients throughout the Baltimore metropolitan area in both state and federal courts.
Frequently Asked Questions: Money Laundering Charges in Maryland
Does Maryland have a general money laundering law?
No. Criminal Law § 5-623 reaches the proceeds of drug crimes only. Conduct involving the proceeds of a fraud or a theft is generally charged as theft, fraud, or conspiracy in Maryland, or brought federally under 18 U.S.C. § 1956, which is not limited by predicate in the same way.
Can I be charged if I did not know where the money came from?
What is structuring, and is it the same thing?
Why would my case be federal rather than state?
Can the government freeze my accounts before trial?
Contact a Baltimore Money Laundering Defense Attorney Today, Free Consultation
A money laundering charge does not have to define your future. Depending on the facts of your case, various defense strategies and legal options may be available, from what the government can prove about where the money came from to whether a transaction was actually meant to conceal anything.
Call Walsh-Little Law today at 410-205-9337 for a free, confidential consultation. David will review your case, explain your options, and start building a defense from day one.
- Monday 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
- Tuesday 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
- Wednesday 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
- Thursday 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
- Friday 8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Email Us
We look forward to receiving your questions and comments and will reply to your email promptly.
* Required Field
"*" indicates required fields
Disclaimer: The Law Office of David Walsh-Little is a Maryland Limited Liability Company established for the practice of law. The information on this website is for general information only. The content on this site is not legal advice and should not be construed as such. Visitors to this site should not rely on its content when making legal decisions. Access to the information on this website is not intended to, and does not create, an attorney-client relationship between the Law Office of David Walsh-Little, LLC and any other person or entity.
